These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Robotic fundoplication for gastro-oesophageal reflux disease].
    Author: Costi R, Himpens J, Iusco D, Sarli L, Violi V, Roncoroni L, Cadière GB.
    Journal: Chir Ital; 2004; 56(3):321-31. PubMed ID: 15287628.
    Abstract:
    Presented as a possible "second" revolution in general surgery after the introduction of laparoscopy during the last few years, the robotic approach to mini-invasive surgery has not yet witnessed wide, large-scale diffusion among general surgeons and is still considered an "experimental approach". In general surgery, the laparoscopic treatment of gastrooesophageal reflux is the second most frequently performed robot-assisted procedure after cholecystectomy. A review of the literature and an analysis of the costs may allow a preliminary evaluation of the pros and cons of robotic fundoplication, which may then be applicable to other general surgery procedures. Eleven articles report 91 cases of robotic fundoplication (75 Nissen, 9 Thal, 7 Toupet). To date, there is no evidence of benefit in terms of duration of surgery, rate of complications and hospital stay. Moreover, robotic fundoplication is more expensive than the traditional laparoscopic approach (the additional cost per procedure due to robotics is 1,882.97 euros). Only further technological upgrades and advances will make the use of robotics competitive in general surgery. The development of multi-functional instruments and of tactile feedback at the console, enlargement of the three-dimensional laparoscopic view and specific "team" training will enable the use of robotic surgery to be extended to increasingly difficult procedures and to non-specialised environments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]