These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Soft tissue healing around implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision: a clinical report.
    Author: Covani U, Barone A, Cornelini R, Crespi R.
    Journal: Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(4):549-53. PubMed ID: 15346752.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: The purposes of the present study were to evaluate implants placed immediately after tooth extraction without incision or primary flap closure and to observe the peri-implant soft tissue healing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (9 men and 6 women) aged 31 to 54 years were included in this study. Each patient had a tooth that required extraction, and each had at least 4 mm of bone beyond the root apex. Teeth with multiple roots were excluded from this study. After tooth extraction, the implants were immediately placed without incision or flap elevation. Implant sites showing bone fenestrations, bone dehiscences, or peri-implant bone defects exceeding 2 mm were excluded from this study. In these cases, a standard guided bone regeneration procedure with a surgical flap elevation was used. The second-stage surgical procedure was performed 6 months after the first procedure. The following clinical parameters were evaluated at the time of implant placement and at second-stage surgery: levels of mesial and distal papillae, width of keratinized mucosa, position of mucogingival junction relating to the surrounding tissues, and peri-implant radiolucency and marginal bone loss, which were evaluated radiographically. RESULTS: The postsurgical healing period was uneventful for all patients. Soft tissue closure over the implant sites was achieved in 1 to 3 weeks after surgery at all sites. At second-stage surgery, no peri-implant bone defects were observed or detected by probing around all the experimental implants. The soft tissue anatomy was considered clinically acceptable in all patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Successful osseointegration and complete bone healing were observed for all patients. The soft tissue healing and morphology were satisfactory; additional mucogingival surgery was not required before definitive prosthetic rehabilitation.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]