These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Cytogenetic and fluorescence in situ hybridization monitoring in Ph+ Chronic Myeloid Leukemia patients treated with imatinib mesylate.
    Author: Fugazza G, Miglino M, Bruzzone R, Quintino S, Gatti AM, Grasso R, Gobbi M, Frassoni F, Sessarego M.
    Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2004 Jun; 23(2):295-9. PubMed ID: 15354415.
    Abstract:
    Imatinib mesylate determines a favorable clinical course in most Ph positive Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) patients in the chronic phase. Cytogenetic response is usually evaluated by analyzing 20-25 bone marrow metaphases using standard banding techniques. Since this methodology has very low sensitivity, we compared the results obtained by standard banding techniques to the ones obtained by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). This was also done to identify any possible discrepancies between the two techniques. We analyzed 40 Ph+ CML patients in the chronic phase who had previously been treated with interferon alpha (IFNalpha) and who were receiving imatinib. The studies were performed by utilizing the same BM cell samples fixed in acetic acid/methanol, before imatinib therapy and then quarterly. Comparison of cytogenetic results to FISH results at 3 and 6 months of imatinib treatment showed that some patients who had achieved major cytogenetic response (i.e.<35% of examined metaphases showing Ph), showed retention of a higher number of persisting Ph+ cells when examined by FISH, and they did not achieve major FISH response (i.e. <35% of examined interphase cells show the BCR-ABL fusion signal). The discrepancy we found between the results that were obtained by analyzing metaphases and interphase cells disappeared in the subsequent examinations. Moreover, we found that 4 patients (10%) were still Ph+ in all the metaphases we examined even though they achieved excellent clinical response. On the basis of this small series of patients, we suggest that cytogenetic evaluation of patients on imatinib therapy should be performed by utilizing the classic banding technique (metaphase examination), but also by using the FISH technique (interphase examination), since the two methodologies may provide different results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]