These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Computed tomography-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration in diagnosis of lung cancer: a comparison of single-pass needle and multiple-pass coaxial needle systems and the value of immediate cytological assessment.
    Author: Küçük CU, Yilmaz A, Yilmaz A, Akkaya E.
    Journal: Respirology; 2004 Aug; 9(3):392-6. PubMed ID: 15363014.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to compare single-pass needle and multiple-pass coaxial needle systems and to evaluate the value of immediate cytological assessment during the procedure in the diagnosis of lung cancer with CT-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration. METHODOLOGY: One hundred and forty-three consecutive patients who underwent CT-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration were divided into three groups. In the first group (group A, 48 patients), a single-pass needle was used for aspiration, but immediate cytological examination was not performed. In the second group (group B, 48 patients), a single-pass needle was used for aspiration and a pathologist immediately assessed the adequacy of the sample obtained. In the third group (group C, 47 patients), a multiple-pass coaxial needle was used for aspiration and a pathologist immediately assessed the adequacy of the sample obtained. RESULTS: The mean number of fine-needle aspirations was 1.25 in group A, 1.39 in group B and 1.34 in group C (group A vs group B, P = 0.08). The diagnostic accuracy was 83.3, 97.9 and 100.0%, respectively (group A vs group B, P = 0.03; group B vs group C, P > 0.05). Although immediate cytological assessment resulted in adequate samples being obtained from all patients in groups B and C, adequate samples were obtained in 41 of 48 patients (85.4%) in group A (P = 0.004). There was no statistically significant difference among the groups with respect to the rate of pneumothorax. CONCLUSIONS: A single-pass needle technique in transthoracic fine-needle aspiration is preferred because there is no significant difference between single-pass needle and multiple-pass coaxial needle systems with respect to the diagnostic accuracy and the complication rate and, in addition, the single-pass needle has a lower cost. The results of the present study suggest that immediate cytological assessment during the procedure reduces an inadequate sampling rate, thus increasing the diagnostic accuracy of the procedure.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]