These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Total intravenous anesthesia using propofol and alfentanil as compared to combined inhalation anesthesia reduces the flow velocity in the middle cerebral artery. A Doppler sonographic study].
    Author: Fischer M, Moskopp D, Nadstawek J, Ries F.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 1992 Jan; 41(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 1536436.
    Abstract:
    Anesthesia for craniotomies should guarantee hemodynamic stability, preservation of cerebral autoregulation, and rapid postoperative recovery of consciousness. Increases in intracranial pressure (ICP) and postoperative respiratory depression should be avoided. Combined anesthesia (KA) with N2O and volatile anesthetics may increase cerebral blood flow (CBF), ICP, and cerebral oxygen consumption. According to recent studies, total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol and alfentanil seems to best fulfill the requirements. Using transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) (TC2-64, EME), we studied the influence of TIVA and KA under normo- and hyperventilation on the blood flow velocity (BFV) and pulsatility of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). METHODS. Two groups of 10 patients each undergoing craniotomy were investigated. Systolic and mean BFV, pulsatility index, mean arterial blood pressure, heart rate, and arterial CO2 tension were measured at four time intervals: (1) preoperatively; (2) 15 min after anesthesia induction under normoventilation, preoperatively; (3) 25 min after anesthesia induction under hyperventilation, preoperatively; and (4) 6 h postoperatively. The patients were premedicated with flunitrazepam 1 mg PO. TIVA was induced with 60 mg propofol, 1 mg alfentanil, and 6 mg vecuronium; simultaneously infusions of propofol (15 mg/min) and alfentanil (0.3 mg/min) were started and were maintained until the dura was completely opened. The infusion rates were then reduced to 6 mg/min propofol until skin suturing and 0.1 mg/min alfentanil until dural suturing was completed. Patients were ventilated with O2/air (fiO2 = 0.5). In the KA group anesthesia was induced with 4-6 mg/kg thiopental, 0.15 mg fentanyl, and 6 mg vecuronium and maintained with boluses of fentanyl, N2O (fiO2 = 0.5), and isoflurane (1.3 MAC). The time course is illustrated in Figs. 1 and 2 and the results are shown in Tables 1 and 2. They were tested using a one-factor analysis of variance and the Kruskal-Wallis range test. RESULTS. There was a significant decrease in systolic and mean BFV combined with an increase in pulsatility index after induction of TIVA, while KA induction effected no significant change in cerebral hemodynamics. The subsequent hyperventilation caused a similar decrease in mean BFV and increase in pulsatility index in both groups. CONCLUSION. Using the assumption that the diameter of the MCA is nearly constant, the reduction in BFV associated with an increase in pulsatility during TIVA is explainable as a decrease in CBF. By having a comparable influence on hemodynamics, the reduction in CBF with increase in cerebral vascular resistance seems to make TIVA the more advantageous anesthesia technique for patients with reduced intracranial compliance.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]