These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Impact of the percentage of positive prostate cores on prostate cancer-specific mortality for patients with low or favorable intermediate-risk disease.
    Author: D'Amico AV, Renshaw AA, Cote K, Hurwitz M, Beard C, Loffredo M, Chen MH.
    Journal: J Clin Oncol; 2004 Sep 15; 22(18):3726-32. PubMed ID: 15365069.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: We investigated whether pretreatment factors predicted time to prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) after conventional-dose and conformal radiation therapy (CRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1988 and 2002, 421 patients with low (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level < or = 10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason score < or = 6) or favorable intermediate-risk (PSA > 10 to 15 ng/mL or biopsy Gleason score 3 + 4, but not both factors) disease underwent CRT (median dose, 70.4 Gy). Cox regression multivariable analysis was performed to determine whether the PSA level, Gleason score, T category, or the percentage of positive cores (% PC) predicted time to PCSM after CRT. After a median follow-up of 4.5 years, 117 (28%) patients have died. RESULTS: The % PC was the only significant predictor (Cox P < or =.03). The relative risk of PCSM after CRT for patients with > or = 50% as compared with less than 50% PC was 10.4 (95% CI, 1.2 to 87; Cox P =.03), 6.1 (95% CI, 1.3 to 28.6; Cox P =.02), and 12.5 (95% CI, 1.5 to 107; Cox P =.02) in men with a PSA < or = 10 and Gleason score < or = 6, PSA < or = 10 and Gleason score < or = 7, and PSA < or = 15 and Gleason score < or = 6, respectively. By 5 years after CRT, 5% to 9% compared with less than 1% (log-rank P < or =.01) of these patients experienced PCSM if they had > or = 50% compared with less than 50% PC, respectively. CONCLUSION: CRT dose-escalation techniques, the addition of hormonal therapy, or both should be considered in the management of patients with low or favorable intermediate-risk disease and > or = 50% PC.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]