These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Determination of both the time constant of vO2 and DeltavO2/DeltaW from a single incremental exercise test: validation and repeatability. Author: Wisén AG, Wohlfart B. Journal: Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2004 Sep; 24(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 15383081. Abstract: A single incremental cycle exercise test including a steady-state load, combined with respiratory gas exchange, was performed with the objective of determining the time constant (tauVO(2)) and the amount of oxygen required at each load (DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW) by using a novel equation. The protocol was validated using four exercise tests at different constant loads and conventionally fitted mono-exponential functions to determine tauVO(2), and interpolation of VO(2) versus load to determine DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW. No significant differences were seen between the means of either tauVO(2) or DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW determined with the two protocols. The correlation coefficient was 0.62 for tauVO(2) and 0.48 for DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW. The absolute differences (2 SD) were 11.6 s for tauVO(2) and 1.1 ml min(-1) W(-1) for DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW. The equations were compared in the same steady-state test and good agreement of tauVO(2) was obtained (R = 0.99). The 5-6-week repeatability (incremental test) was evaluated. No statistical differences were seen between the mean of the repeated tests. The difference between the tests (2 SD) were 20 s for tauVO(2) and 1.2 ml min(-1) W(-1) for DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW. In conclusion, tauVO(2) and DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW can be determined from a single incremental test. The validation showed an acceptable agreement, although the variations in absolute values were not negligible. This could partly be explained by the natural day-to-day variation and fluctuations in incoming raw data. The test-retest variation in absolute values was considerable, which must be taken into account when using tauVO(2) and DeltaVO(2)/DeltaW for evaluation of aerobic function.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]