These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of conventional, conformal and intensity-modulated coplanar radiotherapy plans for posterior fossa treatment.
    Author: Breen SL, Kehagioglou P, Usher C, Plowman PN.
    Journal: Br J Radiol; 2004 Sep; 77(921):768-74. PubMed ID: 15447964.
    Abstract:
    Radiotherapy of the posterior fossa for medulloblastoma treatment can induce ototoxicity, especially when combined with cisplatin chemotherapy. Sensorineural hearing loss can be severe enough to cause permanent disability, which may compromise cognitive development in paediatric patients. This study evaluates the sparing of the cochlea in conventional radiotherapy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). CT scans of three patients were used to plan posterior fossa radiotherapy using coplanar beam arrangements. The posterior fossa and the cochlea were contoured as well as other organs-at-risk (non-posterior fossa brain, lenses, optic nerves, pituitary and cervical spinal cord). Three treatment plans were compared: conventional two-dimensional treatment (parallel-opposed lateral pair); 3D-CRT (two wedged posterior oblique fields); and a four-field coplanar IMRT plan. 3D-CRT and IMRT reduced cochlear doses to less than 70% of the mean target dose. These plans also reduced dose to the non-posterior fossa brain and cervical spinal cord. IMRT showed no advantage over 3D-CRT in sparing the optic nerves and lenses, compared with 3D-CRT. Normal tissue doses were higher in both conformal techniques than in the IMRT plans. Conformal techniques reduced the dose to the cochlea, non-posterior fossa brain and cervical spinal cord. The small size and proximity to the planning target volume (PTV) of the cochlea limited the effectiveness of the IMRT plan. Coplanar 3D-CRT was judged superior to coplanar IMRT, particularly in children, because it achieved adequate sparing of the cochlea and anterior cranial structures, such as the lenses and optic nerves, without compromising the dose to the posterior fossa.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]