These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of instruments and laboratories used to measure milk urea nitrogen in bulk-tank milk samples.
    Author: Kohn RA, French KR, Russek-Cohen E.
    Journal: J Dairy Sci; 2004 Jun; 87(6):1848-53. PubMed ID: 15453501.
    Abstract:
    The objective of this study was to compare the instruments and laboratories that are currently used for analysis of milk urea nitrogen (MUN) for bulk-tank milk samples. Two replicate samples from each bulk tank on 10 different dairy farms were sent to 12 Dairy Herd Improvement Association (DHIA) laboratories throughout the US for MUN analysis. Two laboratories used 2 different methods for MUN analysis for a total of 14 analyses on 20 samples (n = 280). Values of MUN were analyzed using a random effects model with farm, laboratory, and farm x laboratory variance components. Greater than 98% of the variance in measured MUN was attributed to farm-to-farm variance for analysis of MUN by the Bentley, CL 10, Foss 6000, and Skalar instruments. However, for the laboratories using the Foss 4000 system, <60% of the variance in MUN was attributed to farm-to-farm variance. Laboratories using the Bentley, CL 10, Foss 6000, and Skalar instruments provided slightly different results for MUN analysis, but >95% of sample measurements fell within 1.75 mg/ dL of each other. The laboratories using Foss 4000 differed from each other, and 95% of samples fell within 5 mg/dL of the CL 10 measurement. Laboratories using the Foss 4000 instrument did not consistently provide measurements of MUN that were similar to each other or to the measurements of the other instruments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]