These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Copying referral letters to patients: the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors.
    Author: White P, Singleton A, Jones R.
    Journal: Patient Educ Couns; 2004 Oct; 55(1):94-8. PubMed ID: 15476995.
    Abstract:
    To discover the views of patients, patient representatives and doctors on copying referral letters to patients. A three-part study: an analysis of 50 GP referral letters against a standard template; 35 patient interviews using a semi-structured questionnaire in outpatient waiting rooms; 3 focus groups of patients, patient representatives and doctors. There was general agreement that copying referral letters to patients could improve information and decision sharing with patients. Copying referral letters could provide an opportunity for patients to correct mistakes, prepare for their appointments and have a personal record that they could keep and show to others. However, there were concerns about letter content, particularly medical terminology, character judgements and "sensitive" patient information. It was also recognised that providing more information to patients could increase patient anxiety. The style and content of some referral letters may need to change. This is particularly relevant where certain types of information included in referral letters could cause distress for patients or influence the time that patients have to wait for their outpatient appointments.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]