These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Explaining reductions in FDA drug review times: PDUFA matters. Author: Olson MK. Journal: Health Aff (Millwood); 2003; Suppl Web Exclusives():W4-S1-W4-S2. PubMed ID: 15506166. Abstract: Yale professor Mary Olson responds to the paper titled "Approval Times for New Drugs: Does the Source of Funding for FDA Staff Matter?" by Daniel Carpenter and colleagues (Health Affairs Web Exclusive, 17 December 2003). According to her analysis, the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) of 1992, which introduced user fees for new-drug review, had a greater impact on reducing drug approval times than the analysis of Carpenter and colleagues found. Olson's analysis examined review times aggregated by year of approval, instead of the year that the drug application was submitted. She found that even after increased agency resources over time were controlled for, the user fee reform led to a substantial reduction in drug review times. She also found that there was little reduction in drug review times until after user fees were introduced.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]