These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Streptokinase and enoxaparin in the pre-hospital management of the ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction.
    Author: Tatu-Chiţoiu G, Oprişan M, Cismara O, Marinescu R, Marinescu A.
    Journal: Rom J Intern Med; 2002; 40(1-4):11-25. PubMed ID: 15526537.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: In a pilot study, safety and efficacy of an accelerated Streptokinase (SK) regimen (0.75 MU/10 min. repeated after 50 min. if no signs of coronary reperfusion were detected) in combination with enoxaparin was evaluated in the prehospital (preASENOX regimen) and in the in-hospital (in ASENOX regimen) phase of the ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction (STAMI) and compared to the in-hospital standard SK plus Heparin (the StSK regimen). METHODS: A group of 262 consecutive patients (age 34-74 years) thrombolised within the first 6 hours after the onset of STAMI was divided in three subgroups according to the mentioned regimens: preASENOX (64 patients); in ASENOX (69 patients) and StSK (129 patients). Enoxaparin was administered i.v. 40 mg before the first dose of 0.75 MU of SK and 1 mg/kg every 12 hours for 5-7 days. Heparin was infused 1000 i.u./h 48-96 hrs. Three noninvasive reperfusion criteria were used: 1) Rapid cessation of the chest pain; 2) Rapid decreasing of the ST segment elevations by more than 50% from the initial value; 3) Rapid increasing of the CK and CK-MB with a peak within the first 12 hrs. RESULTS: The chest pain-thrombolysis time was 145 +/- 52 min in the preASENOX subgroup, significantly shorter as that in the ASENOX subgroup (172 +/- 73 min, p = 0.016) and the StSK one (168 +/- 80 min, p = 0.038). The ratios of the CR were 81.2%, 78.2% and 62.0%, respectively (preASENOX vs StSK p = 0.025; in ASENOX vs StSK p = 0.030). The inhospital mortalities were: 3.12% (preASENOX); 5.8% (inASENOX) and 10.8% (StSK)(non-significant differences). Only one case of ischemic stroke was registered (in the inASENOX subgroup). Symptomatic hypotension appeared more frequent in the preASENOX (39.06%), and inASENOX (43.47%) subgroups as compared to the SSK one (20.15%). CONCLUSIONS: 1) The preASENOX and inASENOX regimens are safe, and lead toward a significant higher ratios of coronary reperfusion as compared to StSK regimen; 2) Our data suggest a very low mortality in patients treated with the preASENOX regimen. Further investigations (randomized studies) are needed for a definite conclusion.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]