These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A time-to-prescription-refill measure of antiretroviral adherence predicted changes in viral load in HIV.
    Author: Grossberg R, Zhang Y, Gross R.
    Journal: J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Oct; 57(10):1107-10. PubMed ID: 15528063.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to determine the validity and utility of a pharmacy-based time-to-refill measure of antiretroviral therapy adherence. METHODS: We performed an observational cohort study of 110 HIV-infected subjects on a stable, highly active antiretroviral regimen for at least 3 months at a Veterans' Affairs Medical Center in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. RESULTS: The viral load decreased by 0.12 log c/mL (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.01-0.23 log c/mL) for each 10% increase in pharmacy-based time-to-refill defined adherence as compared with 0.05 log c/mL (95% CI -0.14-0.25 log c/mL) for the self-reported adherence measure. Thus, only the refill-defined measure was statistically significantly associated with viral load change. When adherence was classified as good (> or = 85%) versus poor (<85%), both measures demonstrated a significant difference in outcome between groups. Yet, in individuals self-reporting 100% adherence, those classified as good adherers using the pharmacy-based measure had greater viral load reductions than poor adherers (2.4 log c/mL [interquartile range 1.4-3.4] vs. 1.5 log c/mL [interquartile range 0.8-2.4, P=.03). CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacy-based technique is a valid measure of antiretroviral therapy adherence. Because it provides clinically relevant information in subjects who self-report 100% adherence, it should be incorporated into clinical practice and adherence research.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]