These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: The mechanism of magnetic interactions in the bulk ferromagnet para-(methylthio)phenyl nitronyl nitroxide (YUJNEW): a first principles, bottom-up, theoretical study.
    Author: Deumal M, Bearpark MJ, Robb MA, Pontillon Y, Novoa JJ.
    Journal: Chemistry; 2004 Dec 03; 10(24):6422-32. PubMed ID: 15532054.
    Abstract:
    The mechanism of magnetic interactions in the bulk ferromagnet para-(methylthio)phenyl nitronyl nitroxide crystal (YUJNEW) has been theoretically reinvestigated, using only data from ab initio calculations and avoiding any a priori assumptions. We first calculate the microscopic magnetic interactions (JAB exchange couplings) between all unique radical pairs in the crystal, and then generate the macroscopic magnetic properties from the energy levels of the corresponding Heisenberg Hamiltonian. We thus propose a first principles, bottom-up (i.e. micro-to-macro) approach that brings theory and experiment together. We have applied this strategy to study the magnetism of YUJNEW using data from the previously reported 298 and 114 K crystal structures, and also data from a 10 K neutron diffraction structure fully reported in this work. The magnetic topology at 298 K is two-dimensional: noninteracting planes, with three different in-plane JAB pair interactions (+0.24, +0.09, and -0.11 cm(-1)) and one numerically negligible (+0.02 cm(-1)) inter-plane JAB interaction. In contrast, the magnetic topology at 114 and 10 K is three-dimensional, with two non-negligible in-plane JAB constants (+0.11 and +0.07 cm(-1) at 114 K; +0.22 and +0.07 cm(-1) at 10 K) and one inter-plane pair interaction (+0.07 cm(-1) at 114 K; +0.08 cm(-1) at 10 K). Although this three-dimensional magnetic topology is consistent with YUJNEW being a bulk ferromagnet, there is only a qualitative agreement between computed and experimental magnetic susceptibility chiT(T) data at 114 K. However, the experimental chiT(T) curve is quantitatively reproduced at 10 K. The heat capacity curve presents a peak at around 0.12 K, close to the estimated experimental peak (0.20 K).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]