These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Evaluation of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM scores in patients with gastric cancer undergoing resection.
    Author: Gocmen E, Koc M, Tez M, Keskek M, Kilic M, Ertan T.
    Journal: Hepatogastroenterology; 2004; 51(60):1864-6. PubMed ID: 15532845.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM models on patients undergoing elective gastric resection. METHODOLOGY: P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM predictor equations for mortality were applied retrospectively to 126 patients who had undergone elective gastrectomy for cancer. Observed mortality rates were compared with rates predicted by P-POSSUM and O-POSSUM using the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Evaluation of the discriminative capability of both models was performed using receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. RESULTS: Overall fourteen deaths were observed. O-POSSUM predicted 15 deaths (chi2=14.61, p=0.13) and P-POSSUM predicted 20 deaths (chi2=25.41, p=0.002) using the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. ROC curves analysis revealed that O-POSSUM had better discriminatory power for mortality compared to P-POSSUM (area under curve=0.880, for O-POSSUM and area under curve=0.703 for P-POSSUM). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that O-POSSUM predicts mortality more accurately than P-POSSUM in patients undergoing elective gastrectomy for cancer.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]