These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Comparison of modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral reimplantation techniques after radical cystectomy.
    Author: Lee CT, Chen BT, Gong E, Hafez KS, Sheffield JH, Montie JE.
    Journal: Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):940-4. PubMed ID: 15533482.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To present our experience with the modified Taguchi "single-stitch" ureteral reimplantation technique in patients undergoing radical cystectomy with urinary diversion compared with a traditional Bricker reimplantation technique. Improved techniques are continually sought for ureteroenteric anastomoses during urinary diversion. The modified Taguchi "single-stitch" ureteral reimplantation is reportedly a time-efficient technique that preserves anastomotic integrity. METHODS: We retrospectively examined 75 consecutive patients with bladder cancer who underwent cystectomy and urinary diversion between October 1, 1999 and March 31, 2001. The ureteroenteric anastomosis was performed using a reinforced single-stitch modified Taguchi technique in the first 36 patients and an interrupted two-layer Bricker technique in the subsequent 39 patients during the creation of 47 orthotopic neobladders and 28 ileal conduit diversions. Ureteral stents were not routinely used. The demographic and perioperative clinical parameters were evaluated in each cohort, with particular attention to ureteral complications. RESULTS: Modified Taguchi and Bricker ureteral anastomoses were performed in 48% and 52% of patients, respectively. Patient age, sex, and body mass indexes were similar between groups. Apart from pathologic stage, univariate analysis did not demonstrate statistically significant differences between the groups in the demographic, intraoperative (estimated blood loss, diversion type, operative time) or postoperative (length of stay, rate of complications) parameters. Ureteral complications occurred in 8% of the Bricker group and 15% of the modified Taguchi group (P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Either technique can be performed safely and in a timely fashion. However, the increased number of ureteral leaks in the modified Taguchi cohort combined with no advantage in procedure time, prompted our return to the Bricker technique exclusively.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]