These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Subinguinal microvaricocelectomy versus retroperitoneal varicocelectomy: comparative study of complications and surgical outcome.
    Author: Ghanem H, Anis T, El-Nashar A, Shamloul R.
    Journal: Urology; 2004 Nov; 64(5):1005-9. PubMed ID: 15533495.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVES: To compare and assess objectively the postoperative outcome parameters of both microsurgical subinguinal artery sparing and retroperitoneal high ligation techniques for varicocele in infertile men. METHODS: We performed a prospective study that included 413 consecutive patients who presented with varicocele. Of the 413 patients, 304 underwent subinguinal varicocelectomy (group 1) and 109 patients underwent high ligation varicocelectomy (group 2). Subinguinal varicocelectomies were performed under local anesthesia, with intravenous propofol sedation administered as needed. The operating microscope (x10 to x16) was used to spare the arteries and lymphatics. High ligation was performed through a retroperitoneal approach. RESULTS: All patients went home on the evening after surgery with minimal discomfort. No intraoperative complications occurred. The internal spermatic artery was identified in all microvaricocelectomy cases. No testicular atrophy occurred in either group. Five (1.6%) and seven (6.4%) hydroceles were identified at the 3-month postoperative visit in groups 1 and 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Microvaricocelectomy is safe and effective and associated with a rapid recovery and minimal morbidity. However, it requires microsurgical training.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]