These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Ab initio calculations and vibrational energy level fits for the lower singlet potential-energy surfaces of C3.
    Author: Ahmed K, Balint-Kurti GG, Western CM.
    Journal: J Chem Phys; 2004 Nov 22; 121(20):10041-51. PubMed ID: 15549879.
    Abstract:
    Ab initio multireference configuration interaction potential energy surfaces are computed for the eight lowest singlet surfaces of C(3). These reveal several important features, including several conical intersections in linear, nonlinear, and equilateral triangle geometries. These intersections are important because, particularly for the excited A (1)Pi(u) state, reasonable ab initio results could only be obtained by including nearby, near degenerate, (1)Sigma(u) (-) and (1)Delta(u) states that cross the A (1)Pi(u) state around 4500 cm(-1) above the equilibrium geometry, and a (1)Pi(g) state whose potential in turn crosses the other states about 2000 cm(-1) further up. These states are probably responsible for the complexity of the shorter wavelength UV absorption spectrum of C(3). The computed potential energy surface for the ground, X (1)Sigma(g) (+), state and for the lowest two excited singlet surfaces (which both correlate with the A (1)Pi(u) state in a collinear geometry) are fitted to analytic functional forms. Vibrational energy levels are calculated for both states, taking account of the Renner-Teller coupling in the excited A (1)Pi(u) state. The potential parameters for both states are then least-squares fitted to experimental data. The ground-state fit covers a range of approximately 8500 cm(-1) above the lowest level, and reproduces 100 observed vibrational levels with an average error of 2.8 cm(-1). The A (1)Pi(u) state surfaces cover a range of 3250 cm(-1) above the zero-point level, and reproduce the 44 observed levels in this range with an average error of 2.8 cm(-1).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]