These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Bacterial diversity of a soil sample from Schirmacher Oasis, Antarctica.
    Author: Shivaji S, Reddy GS, Aduri RP, Kutty R, Ravenschlag K.
    Journal: Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand); 2004 Jul; 50(5):525-36. PubMed ID: 15559969.
    Abstract:
    The bacterial diversity of a soil sample collected in the vicinity of Lake Zub, Schirmacher Oasis, Antarctica, was determined both by establishing pure colonies of culturable bacteria and by cloning the total 16S rDNA of the soil and establishing the phylogeny of the clones. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene clones indicated that the bacteria belonged to the classes alpha-proteobacteria, beta-proteobacteria, gamma-proteobacteria, Gemmatimonas, Bacteriodetes, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi and Chlamydiae. In addition, seven clones were categorized as unidentified and unculturable in the classes of beta-Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Chloroflexi and Chlamydiae. Further, the culturable bacteria from the same site were identified as belonging to the genera Pseudomonas, Sphingobacterium, Arthrobacter, Micrococcus, Brevondimonas, Rhodococcus and Microbacterium. These results identify for the first time the presence of bacteria belonging to the genera Brevundimonas, Microbacterium, Rhodococcus, Serratia, Enterobacter, Rhodopseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Acidovorax, Burkholderia, Nevskia, Gemmatimonas, Xanthomonas and Flexibacter in Antarctica. Further, comparison of the Antarctic soil bacterial diversity with other cold habitats of Antarctica like from sediments, ice and cyanobacterial mat samples indicated that the bacterial diversity in soil was similar to the diversity observed in the continental shelf sediment sample. The Antarctic soil clones also resembled the bacterial diversity of soils from other geographical regions, but were unique in that none of the clones from the soil belonged to the uncultured Y, O, G, A and B groups common to all soil samples.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]