These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Second-line treatment for Helicobacter pylori infection in Japan: proton pump inhibitor-based amoxicillin and metronidazole regimen.
    Author: Nagahara A, Miwa H, Kawabe M, Kurosawa A, Asaoka D, Hojo M, Iijima K, Terai T, Ohkusa T, Miyazaki A, Sato N.
    Journal: J Gastroenterol; 2004 Nov; 39(11):1051-5. PubMed ID: 15580397.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Recent studies have reported that proton pump inhibitor (PPI)/amoxicillin (A) metronidazole (M) therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection provides a sufficient cure rate in Japan in patients who have failed first-line treatment with PPI/amoxicillin and clarithromycin (AC). To validate the efficacy of this regimen as second-line therapy, our experience with second-line treatment using a PPI/AM regimen was reviewed. METHODS: We analyzed data on 151 patients who had been prescribed a 10-day PPI/AM re-treatment regimen after eradication failure of 1 to 2 weeks' first-line PPI/AC therapy. The PPI/AM regimen was given according to results of susceptibility testing (S+) in 31 patients. The group that had undergone susceptibility testing was further divided into two subgroups according to dosage: standard dose of omeprazole (O)/AM (n = 11) and double dose of lansoprazole (L)/AM (n = 20). The PPI/AM regimen was given without susceptibility testing (S-) to 120 patients. These patients were also divided into two subgroups according to whether they received omeprazole or lansoprazole: OAM (n = 61) and LAM (n = 59). Cure rates and adverse effects in each group were analyzed. RESULTS: The intention-to-treat (ITT)-based cure rate with/without susceptibility testing was 93.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 79%-99%) and 87.5% (95% CI, 80%-93%), respectively (not significant [NS]). The ITT-based cure rate in S+/S- for OAM and S+/S- for LAM was 90.9% (95% CI, 59%-100%)/82% (95% CI, 70%-91%), and 95% (95% CI, 75%-100%)/93.2% (95% CI, 84%-98%), respectively (NS). Adverse effects were seen in 26.3% and 32.5% of patients in the OAM group and the LAM group, respectively (NS). CONCLUSIONS: The 10-day PPI/AM re-treatment regimen is safe and effective, suggesting its usefulness as second-line treatment in Japan in patients who have failed initial treatment with the PPI/AC regimen.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]