These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A murine model of antimetabolite-based, submyeloablative conditioning for bone marrow transplantation: biologic insights and potential applications.
    Author: Goebel WS, Pech NK, Meyers JL, Srour EF, Yoder MC, Dinauer MC.
    Journal: Exp Hematol; 2004 Dec; 32(12):1255-64. PubMed ID: 15588950.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: Nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens for marrow transplantation are desirable in many settings. Because repeated doses of the antimetabolite 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) decreases marrow long-term repopulating ability (LTRA) upon transplantation into lethally irradiated hosts, we hypothesized that mice given sequential doses of 5-FU (termed paired dose 5-FU) may permit substantial syngeneic marrow engraftment. METHODS: C57Bl/6 or X-linked chronic granulomatous disease (X-CGD) mice were administered 5-FU (150 mg/kg) on days -5 and -1. Assessment of host marrow phenotype and repopulating ability occurred on day 0. Transplantation of syngeneic donor marrow occurred on day 0 or day +15. RESULTS: We confirmed that the number of Sca-1+lin- cells and the LTRA of marrow from paired dose 5-FU-treated animals were diminished. C57Bl/6 hosts conditioned with paired doses of 5-FU followed by transplantation of 20 x 10(6) fresh B6.SJL marrow cells on day 0 displayed 44.9% +/- 7.1% donor chimerism 2 months posttransplant, and 34.4% +/- 8.6% donor chimerism 6 months posttransplant. In contrast, paired dose 5-FU-conditioned hosts transplanted with similar numbers of donor cells on day +15 exhibited only 3.4% +/- 1.2% donor chimerism at 2 months. Paired dose 5-FU-conditioned X-CGD hosts transplanted with MSCV-m91Neo-transduced X-CGD marrow averaged 6.6% +/- 2.3% (range, 4%-10%) NADPH oxidase-reconstituted neutrophils 12-16 months after transplant. CONCLUSION: These findings support the concept that impairment of host stem cell competitiveness may be an important mechanism for permitting engraftment of donor cells, and suggest that only a brief period of modest host stem cell impairment may be necessary to achieve substantial donor cell engraftment.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]