These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Factors that influence use of a home cardiorespiratory monitor for infants: the collaborative home infant monitoring evaluation.
    Author: Silvestri JM, Lister G, Corwin MJ, Smok-Pearsall SM, Baird TM, Crowell DH, Cantey-Kiser J, Hunt CE, Tinsley L, Palmer PH, Mendenhall RS, Hoppenbrouwers TT, Neuman MR, Weese-Mayer DE, Willinger M, Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation Study Group.
    Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med; 2005 Jan; 159(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 15630053.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: As part of the Collaborative Home Infant Monitoring Evaluation, a home monitor was developed to record breathing, heart rate, other physiologic variables, and the time the monitor was used. OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency of monitor use, factors that influence use, and validity of a model developed to predict use. DESIGN: We developed a model to predict monitor use using multiple linear regression analysis; we then tested the validity of this model to predict adherence for the first week of monitoring and for the subsequent 4-week period (weeks 2-5). SETTING: Clinical research centers in Chicago, Ill; Cleveland, Ohio; Honolulu, Hawaii; Los Angeles, Calif; and Toledo, Ohio. Patients Preterm infants, infants younger than 1 month with a history of autopsy-confirmed sudden infant death syndrome in a sibling, and infants with an idiopathic apparent life-threatening event were divided into 2 cohorts based on enrollment date. Main Outcome Measure Mean hours of monitor use per week. RESULTS: In cohort 1, the variables available before monitoring were only weakly associated with total hours of monitor use in weeks 2 to 5 (total model r(2) = 0.08). However, when hours of monitor use in week 1 were included as a variable to predict monitor use in weeks 2 to 5, the r(2) increased to 0.64 for hours of monitor use per week. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show that monitor use in the first week was the most important variable for predicting subsequent monitor use. The study suggests that a major focus of home monitoring should be adherence in the first week, although it remains to be tested whether this adherence can be altered.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]