These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Persistence of chromosome aberrations following acute radiation: II, does it matter how translocations are scored?
    Author: Tucker JD, Cofield J, Matsumoto K, Ramsey MJ, Freeman DC.
    Journal: Environ Mol Mutagen; 2005; 45(2-3):249-57. PubMed ID: 15657913.
    Abstract:
    Chromosome breaks and rearrangements resulting from ionizing radiation can be much more complicated than many investigators thought possible some years ago. The realization that not all translocations are reciprocal, that multiway exchanges occur, and that some double-strand breaks are not repaired prior to mitosis have all contributed to the difficulty of knowing how best to identify, record, evaluate, and report chromosome translocations. Here we describe the results of a series of experiments in which blood from two normal healthy subjects was obtained, irradiated with 137Cs gamma-rays in vitro at doses ranging from 0 (controls) to 4 Gy, and cultured. Cells from each dose group and donor were harvested at days 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 7 and evaluated for chromosome damage by simultaneously painting chromosomes 1, 2, and 4 in red and 3, 5, and 6 in green. The persistence of dicentrics, fragments, rings, insertions, and PAINT translocations are reported separately by us in this issue. In this article, we focus on translocations, characterizing the various types in detail and comparing and contrasting their persistence across all dose groups for both donors. The results indicate that the persistence of all translocation types was sufficient to be used for retrospective dosimetry, although nonreciprocal translocations exhibited diminished persistence compared to the other types. We also characterize the kinetics of the radiation dose responses of the two donors who exhibited significant differences in the induction as well as the persistence of translocations. Based on the evidence presented here, we hypothesize that these individuals differ in the recognition and repair of radiation-induced damage as well as in cell cycle checkpoint control. Despite these differences, the temporal frequency of translocation losses at both the high and low doses was similar for both subjects.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]