These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Comparing professional schools and traditional clinical program faculty on measures of professional and scientific achievement.
    Author: Tews MJ, Templer DI, Stokes S, Forward V.
    Journal: Psychol Rep; 2004 Dec; 95(3 Pt 1):837-40. PubMed ID: 15666915.
    Abstract:
    474 faculty in 56 professional clinical psychology programs were compared with 972 faculty from 157 traditional clinical psychology programs. The faculty in the professional programs were more likely to be licensed (93% to 85%) and to be diplomates of the American Board of Professional Psychology (15% to 11%, respectively). The faculty in traditional programs averaged more publications (35 vs 17) and citations, and they were more likely to be fellows of the American Psychological Association (26% to 11%). These differences appear congruent with the different missions and objectives of the two types of programs. There were no differences in the number of years since the doctorate, used as a measure of professional experience.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]