These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Characterization of glutathione S-transferases in juvenile white sturgeon. Author: Donham RT, Morin D, Jewell WT, Burns SA, Mitchell AE, Lamé MW, Segall HJ, Tjeerdema RS. Journal: Aquat Toxicol; 2005 Feb 10; 71(3):203-14. PubMed ID: 15670627. Abstract: Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) are a family of detoxification enzymes that catalyze the conjugation of glutathione (GSH) to electrophiles, thus preventing toxicity. This study characterized the cytosolic GST classes of juvenile white sturgeon (Acipenser transmontanus) liver, using two methods of isolation. The first, which employed affinity chromatography, electrophoresis and immunoblotting against a polyclonal striped bass GST antibody, yielded two cytosolic GSTs. The GSTs were identified by nanospray liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS), peptide mass mapping and MS/MS sequencing, as well as de novo MS/MS sequencing as GST classes pi and mu using the Mascot search engine and the NCBI non-redundant database (nrDB) for both methods. The molecular masses were determined to be 23,548 +/- 23 and 26,027 +/- 23 Da, respectively, using linear matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry. The second method of isolation, which used affinity chromatography and high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC), yielded pi, mu, and possibly two alpha isoforms by MALDI-TOF-TOF, again searching against the NCBI nrDB. The alpha isoforms were determined to have molecular masses of 25,528 +/- 23 and 25,348 +/- 23 Da by electrospray ionization source (ESI)-MS. Overall, it appears that the HPLC method is more sensitive than immunoblotting with the current antibody. Activity of the cytosolic GSTs was evaluated using the substrate 1-chloro-2,4-dinitrobenzene (CDNB) and found to be 2.4 +/- 0.6 U/mg cytosolic protein, and 0.41 +/- 0.05 U/mg cytosolic protein using ethacrynic acid (ETHA).[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]