These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Educational views and attitudes, and career goals of MD-PhD students at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.
    Author: Watt CD, Greeley SA, Shea JA, Ahn J.
    Journal: Acad Med; 2005 Feb; 80(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 15671328.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: Despite the documented contribution of graduates of MD-PhD programs to the medical profession, few data exist concerning the views, attitudes, and career goals of students before they graduate from such programs. METHOD: All 167 students enrolled in the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine Combined Degree Program in the spring of 2002 were invited to participate in an IRB-approved online questionnaire consisting of 81 multiple-choice questions covering students' demographics, satisfaction with their educational experience, future goals and career aspirations, and attitudes and views concerning the physician-scientist model. RESULTS: The 96 MD-PhD students (57.5%) who completed the questionnaire represented a diverse group with individuals from every stage of training. The majority of students were satisfied with their overall educational experience (90.5%). Although students reported an interest in a wide range of clinical specialties, 84.4% indicated plans to pursue a career in research and 79.2% preferred a position at an academic medical center. However, a larger percentage of males (70.7%) than females (50.0%) listed research as their primary professional activity. The range of students' views and attitudes regarding the physician-scientist model suggests that additional education and discussion are warranted. CONCLUSION: The MD-PhD students surveyed at the University of Pennsylvania were satisfied with their education and most were planning research-oriented careers. Yet, the aspirations, views and concerns of individual MD-PhD students were varied. The authors believe this information in aggregate will prove useful to current and future students, combined degree programs, policymakers, and residency directors.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]