These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: A comparison of two methods of undertaking directly observed therapy in a rural indian setting.
    Author: Mathew A, Binks C, Kuruvilla J, Davies PD.
    Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis; 2005 Jan; 9(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 15675553.
    Abstract:
    SETTING: Jharkhand State, rural India. OBJECTIVES: To compare the completion rates of the two tuberculosis control programmes of the Nav Jivan Hospital, Tumbagara, and to show that even in difficult areas, a DOTS programme can be successfully implemented. DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of two DOTS programmes centred on a small rural hospital based on an analysis of case outcome. METHODS: Comparative study between two ways of delivering a DOTS programme. RESULTS: At the end of the treatment period, 359 patients in the hospital unsupervised programme and 158 in the directly observed and hospital checked programme were available for analysis. Completion/cure rates were 64% in the former group and 89.2% in the latter, compared with completion/cure rates of 17% before either programme was adopted. Sputum smear positivity rates were 79.3% and 76.5%, respectively, compared with 6% before the programmes. CONCLUSIONS: A hospital supervised and directly observed treatment (DOT) programme using independent DOT observers can exceed WHO targets for cure/ completion rates even in the poorest rural setting.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]