These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: SAPS II revisited.
    Author: Aegerter P, Boumendil A, Retbi A, Minvielle E, Dervaux B, Guidet B.
    Journal: Intensive Care Med; 2005 Mar; 31(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 15678308.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To construct and validate an update of the Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) for the evaluation of clinical performance of Intensive Care Units (ICU). DESIGN AND SETTING: Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected multicenter data in 32 ICUs located in the Paris area belonging to the Cub-Rea database and participating in a performance evaluation project. PATIENTS: 33,471 patients treated between 1999 and 2000. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Two logistic regression models based on SAPS II were developed to estimate in-hospital mortality among ICU patients. The second model comprised reevaluation of original items of SAPS II and integration of the preadmission location and chronic comorbidity. Internal and external validation were performed. In the two validation samples the most complex model had better calibration than the original SAPS II for in-hospital mortality but its discrimination was not significantly higher (area under ROC curve 0.89 vs. 0.87 for SAPS II). Second-level customization and integration of new items improved uniformity of fit for various categories of patients except for diagnosis-related groups. The rank order of ICUs was modified according to the model used. CONCLUSIONS: The overall performance of SAPS II derived models was good, even in the context of a community cohort and routinely gathered data. However, one-half the variation of outcome remains unexplained after controlling for admission characteristics, and uniformity of prediction across diagnostic subgroups was not achieved. Differences in case-mix still limit comparisons of quality of care.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]