These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Parallel processing of tactile information in the cerebral cortex of the cat: effect of reversible inactivation of SI on responsiveness of SII neurons.
    Author: Turman AB, Ferrington DG, Ghosh S, Morley JW, Rowe MJ.
    Journal: J Neurophysiol; 1992 Feb; 67(2):411-29. PubMed ID: 1569467.
    Abstract:
    1. Localized cortical cooling was employed in anesthetized cats for the rapid reversible inactivation of the distal forelimb region within the primary somatosensory cortex (SI). The aim was to examine the responsiveness of individual neurons in the second somatosensory area (SII) in association with SI inactivation to evaluate the relative importance for tactile processing of the direct thalamocortical projection to SII and the indirect projection from the thalamus to SII via an intracortical path through SI. 2. Response features were examined quantitatively before, during, and after SI inactivation for 29 SII neurons, the tactile receptive fields of which were on the glabrous or hairy skin of the distal forelimb. Controlled mechanical stimuli that consisted of l-s trains of either sinusoidal vibration or rectangular pulses were delivered to the skin by means of small circular probes (4- to 8-mm diam). 3. Twenty-three of the 29 SII neurons (80%) showed no change in response level (in impulses per second) as a result of SI inactivation. These included seven neurons activated exclusively or predominantly by Pacinian corpuscle (PC) receptors, six that received hair follicle input, four activated by convergent input from hairy and glabrous skin, and six driven by dynamically sensitive but non-PC inputs from the glabrous skin. 4. Six SII neurons (20%), also made up of different functional classes, displayed a reduction in response to cutaneous stimuli when SI was inactivated. 5. Stimulus-response relations, constructed by plotting response level in impulses per second against the amplitude of the mechanical stimulus, showed that the effect of SI inactivation on individual neurons was consistent over the whole response range. 6. The reduced response level seen in 20% of SII neurons in association with SI inactivation cannot be attributed to direct spread of cooling from SI to the forelimb area of SII, as there was no evidence for a cooling-induced prolongation in SII spike waveforms, an effect that is known to precede any cooling-induced reduction in responsiveness. 7. As SI inactivation produced a fall in spontaneous activity in the affected SII neurons, we suggest that the inactivation removes a source of background facilitatory influence that arises in SI and affects a small proportion of SII neurons. 8. Phase-locking and therefore the precision of impulse patterning were unchanged in the responses of SII neurons to vibration during SI inactivation. This was the case whether response levels of neurons were reduced or unchanged by SI inactivation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]