These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: How five advanced practice nurses in nephrology spend their time.
    Author: Ridley J, Harwood L, Lawrence-Murphy JA, Locking-Cusolito H, Wilson B.
    Journal: CANNT J; 2000; 10(4):38-42. PubMed ID: 15709339.
    Abstract:
    The purpose of this paper is to report the results of a descriptive study undertaken to examine the scope of practice of five Masters-prepared nephrology nurse practitioner/clinical nurse specialists (NP/CNS) in a mid-size university teaching hospital program. Four of the NP/CNSs practised in three acute care sites, and one in the regional dialysis program. Impetus for the study came from two sources. First, a sixth person practising in the role was retiring and was not to be replaced. Second, the current three-site model for acute care was being transformed into a two-site model, thus creating opportunities to reduce variability in practice among the NP/CNSs. The study examined the activities of the NP/CNS role through the completion of a time documentation tool (TDT) by five nurse practitioners on each of 10 consecutive days of practice. The TDT was adapted from Ackerman's Model of Advanced Practice (1996). The model outlines five domains of practice for advanced practice nurses (APN): direct comprehensive care, support of systems, research, education, and publication and professional leadership. The NP/CNSs spent an average of 9.21 hours at work daily with a range of 8.6 to 10.3 hours. The TDT captured an average of 8.6 hours of working time with a range of 7.3 to 9.9 hours. An average of 72% of time was spent in clinical practice (range 64-83%). An average of 16% (range 11-20%) of time was spent in support of systems. Research (average 4%, range 3-7%), education (average 6%, range 3-16%), and publication and professional leadership (average 2%, range 0-6%) figured less prominently. The major activities performed within the clinical practice domain and the support of systems domain showed less variability across sites than was anticipated. The results of the study have helped the NP/CNSs and their management colleagues analyze and adapt the role to changing clinical requirements and economic realities.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]