These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Varying femoral tunnels between the anatomical footprint and isometric positions: effect on kinematics of the anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knee.
    Author: Musahl V, Plakseychuk A, VanScyoc A, Sasaki T, Debski RE, McMahon PJ, Fu FH.
    Journal: Am J Sports Med; 2005 May; 33(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 15722268.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Knee kinematics and in situ forces resulting from anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions with 2 femoral tunnel positions were evaluated. HYPOTHESIS: A graft placed inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament will restore knee function better than a graft placed at a position for best graft isometry. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Ten cadaveric knees were tested in response to a 134-N anterior load and a combined 10-N.m valgus and 5-N.m internal rotation load. A robotic universal force-moment sensor testing system was used to apply loads, and resulting kinematics were recorded. An active surgical robot system was used for positioning tunnels in 2 locations in the femoral notch: inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament and a position for best graft isometry. The same quadrupled hamstring tendon graft was used for both tunnel positions. The 2 loading conditions were applied. RESULTS: At 30 degrees of knee flexion, anterior tibial translation in response to the anterior load for the intact knee was 9.8 +/- 3.1 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 13.8 +/- 4.6 mm; position 2: 16.6 +/- 3.7 mm; P < .05). There was a significant difference between the 2 tunnel positions. At the same flexion angle, the anterior tibial translation in response to the combined load for the intact knee was 7.7 +/- 4.0 mm. Both femoral tunnel positions resulted in significantly higher anterior tibial translation (position 1: 10.4 +/- 5.5 mm; position 2: 12.0 +/- 5.2 mm; P < .05), with a significant difference between the tunnel positions. CONCLUSION: Neither femoral tunnel position restores normal kinematics of the intact knee. A femoral tunnel position inside the anatomical footprint of the anterior cruciate ligament results in knee kinematics closer to the intact knee than does a tunnel position located for best graft isometry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Anatomical femoral tunnel position is important in reproducing function of the anterior cruciate ligament.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]