These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Larval development assay for detection of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomins of Swedish horses.
    Author: Lind EO, Uggla A, Waller P, Höglund J.
    Journal: Vet Parasitol; 2005 Mar 31; 128(3-4):261-9. PubMed ID: 15740863.
    Abstract:
    The aim of this study was to investigate the suitability of a larval development assay (LDA) for the determination of anthelmintic resistance in cyathostomin nematode populations of the horse. In addition, comparison of results between geographic regions, types of horse establishment, and the use of anthelmintics in Sweden, was established. Seventy horse herds from different parts of Sweden were sampled, and strongyle eggs from the faeces of 54 of those were investigated by an LDA (DrenchRite). The following anthelmintics were tested: thiabendazole (TBZ), levamisole (LEV), ivermectin monosaccharide (IVM-MS), ivermectin aglycone (IVM-AG) and pyrantel (PYR). The LC50 values for TBZ and LEV were generally lower than those previously reported in other LDA studies on horse nematodes. This could be related to the infrequent use of these compounds for the past 20 years in Sweden. In this study, there was a great variation within and between assay plates that could not be explained. Still the LC50 values differed significantly between the regions for all anthelmintics, except for pyrantel. The highest LC50s were observed in parasite populations from the south of Sweden. There were no significant differences between riding schools and studs. Limitations of this technique exist, namely the lack of established cut-off values for susceptible and resistant populations and interpretation problems related to multi-species infections. Although there are advantages with LDA such as the possibility of testing several compounds simultaneously without interference with the deworming programmes on the farms, we conclude that LDA currently is not a reliable alternative to the faecal egg count reduction test (FECRT).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]