These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Comparative clinical study between standard hemodialysis, PHF (HDF on-line) and PHF AF (HDF on-line acetate free)].
    Author: Calzavara P, Malagoli A, Zagatti R.
    Journal: G Ital Nefrol; 2004; 21 Suppl 30():S102-5. PubMed ID: 15747290.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE AND METHODS: In this study, three different techniques were compared in eight uremic patients on regular dialysis treatment: standard hemodialysis (HD), paired hemodiafiltration (PHF) and PHF acetate free (AF). We evaluated the Kt/V, the percentage reduction in Beta 2-microglobulin, the acid-base balance (blood samples were drawn pre-treatment and after 30, 60, 120 and 180 min, post-treatment and pre-treatment of the following session) and the acetate plasma concentration pre- and post-treatment. RESULTS: Between these treatments there were no significant differences in Kt/V and in urea reduction rate (URR). The percentage reduction in plasma Beta 2-microglobulin levels was significantly higher in PHF and in PHF AF than in standard HD. CONCLUSIONS: The correction of acidosis was not significantly different between standard HD and PHF, while it was significantly less effective in PHF AF. The post-dialysis plasma acetate concentration was significantly lower in PHF AF than in standard HD and in PHF with an improvement in cardiovascular (CV) stability and a reduction in oxidative stress.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]