These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Clinical efficacy of a triclosan/copolymer/NaF dentifrice and a commercially available breath-freshening dentifrice on hydrogen sulfide-forming bacteria.
    Author: Vazquez J, Pilch S, Williams MI, Cummins D.
    Journal: Oral Dis; 2005; 11 Suppl 1():64-6. PubMed ID: 15752103.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this randomized, cross-over clinical study was to compare the 4-h and overnight effects of a triclosan/copolymer/fluoride (TCF-AF) dentifrice and a commercially available breath freshening (CBF) dentifrice containing fluoride for their ability to control H(2)S-forming bacteria. METHODS: Following a 1 week washout period of brushing with a regular fluoride dentifrice, subjects reported to the clinical site without performing oral hygiene, eating or drinking in preparation for baseline saliva sampling. After providing a baseline saliva sample, subjects were randomly assigned a test dentifrice and instructed to brush their teeth for 1 min, twice a day for 1 week. On the morning of the eighth day, subjects returned to the test site having refrained from oral hygiene, eating and drinking for overnight sampling. Subjects then brushed for 1 min with the assigned dentifrice, and returned for 2 and 4 h postbrushing evaluations. Following a second 1 week washout, subjects repeated the same regimen, but now using the other dentifrice. Oral micro-flora samples were collected by subjects rinsing with 10 ml of sterile water for 10 s. Each collected sample was serially diluted and plated in duplicate onto lead acetate agar. After incubating for 72 h, dark colonies were counted, expressed as log colony-forming units/ml, and reductions from baseline were calculated. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, the TCF-AF dentifrice reduced H2S-forming bacteria 0.82, 0.80 and 0.22 log units at the 2 and 4 h and overnight time points compared with 0.60, 0.43 and 0.07 log units for the CBF dentifrice. The TCFAF dentifrice was statistically significantly better (P < 0.05) than the CBF dentifrice at 4 h and overnight after brushing the teeth. CONCLUSION: The results of this randomized study indicate that the TCF-AF dentifrice is effective in controlling H2S-producing bacteria.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]