These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Loracarbef (LY163892) versus cefaclor in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.
    Author: Dere WH, Farlow D, Therasse DG, Ruoff GE.
    Journal: Clin Ther; 1992; 14(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 1576625.
    Abstract:
    In this double-blind study, 319 patients (133 men, 186 women) with acute bronchitis were randomly assigned to receive 200 mg of loracarbef twice daily (n = 160; mean age, 42 years) or 250 mg of cefaclor thrice daily (n = 159; mean age, 43 years) for seven days. Clinical and bacteriologic responses were assessed in 63 loracarbef-treated and 56 cefaclor-treated patients in whom pretreatment positive cultures of pathogens susceptible to loracarbef and cefaclor were found. Among these evaluable patients, a clinical cure was found in 68.3% of the loracarbef-treated patients and in 66.1% of the cefaclor-treated patients and improvement in 27.0% and 28.6%, respectively; the pathogen was eliminated in 7.9% and 10.7% and presumed eliminated in 82.5% and 82.1%, respectively. Three in the loracarbef group discontinued treatment because of adverse events, two of which (nausea, nausea/diarrhea/vomiting) were presumably related to the drug. Headache was reported by 9.4% of the 160 patients in the loracarbef group and 6.9% of the 159 patients in the cefaclor group; diarrhea by 5.6% and 6.9%, respectively; and dyspepsia/abdominal pain/gastrointestinal disorders by 5.6% and 4.4%, respectively. It is concluded that both loracarbef and cefaclor are safe and effective in the treatment of acute bacterial bronchitis.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]