These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Cardiac troponin I and C: analytical comparison and clinical-biological interpretation of three troponins assays].
    Author: Bionda C, Pettazzoni M, Rodriguez-Lafrasse C, Ardail D, Rousson R.
    Journal: Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 15771976.
    Abstract:
    Many assays 1(st), 2(nd) even 3(rd) generation are at present available to determine the concentration of cardiac troponin I and T. With the redefinition of upper reference value in the acute coronary syndromes, the aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and analytical performance of 2 troponins assays: Troponin Ic 2(nd) generation (AccuTnI) on Access 2 of Beckman Coulter and Troponin Tc 3(rd)generation (Troponin T STAT) on Elecsys 2010 of Roche Diagnostics. The analytical performance observed with these 2 assays are accurate (analytical and functional sensitivity, repetability and reproductibility). Comparing each method with Dade Behring assay (Flex Troponine-I Cardiaque, TROP) on Dimension RxL, the correlation observed with AccuTnI kit on Access 2 can be put into the equation: AccuTnI = 1.08 (TnIc TROP) - 0.34, r = 0.99. On the contrary, it's more difficult to compare cTnI and cTnT. The study of decisonnal values indicated by Beckman Coulter for cTnI (0.04 microg/L at the 99 degrees percentil, 0.06 microg/L for a CV < or =10%) show a better specificity (76%) and predictive positive value (89%) with a sensitivity at 100% at 0.1 microg/L, fixed and used in the laboratory for its better agreement between sensibility / specificity and its imprecision below 10 %. For the cTnT values published by Roche Diagnostics (0.01 microg/L), at the 99 degrees percentil and 0.03 microg/L for a CV < or = 10%, the specificity is lower, so the decisionnal value 0.1 microg/L seems to be more suitable. During this study, few false positive and negative cTnT values have been observed, in patients with complex pathologies; this eventuality must be taken in consideration if clinical findings are not in good accordance with laboratory results.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]