These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Validity and reliability of the Chinese (Singapore) version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39). Author: Luo N, Tan LC, Li SC, Soh LK, Thumboo J. Journal: Qual Life Res; 2005 Feb; 14(1):273-9. PubMed ID: 15789961. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to validate the Chinese (Singapore) version of the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39CSV) and its briefer version (PDQ-8CSV). METHODS: A convenience sample of Chinese-speaking Singaporeans with Parkinson's disease (PD) (n = 63) completed a questionnaire containing the PDQ-39CSV and the Chinese (Singapore) EQ-5D. A subgroup also participated in a retest and/or a focus group discussion. A priori hypotheses were tested by examining correlations between PDQ-39CSV, PDQ-8CSV and EQ-5D scores and using principal component factor analysis. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach's alpha and intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). RESULTS: Thirty-two PDQ-39CSV items correlated satisfactorily with their hypothesized dimensions (Spearman's p > or = 0.4). Factor analysis yielded a component on which all 8 PDQ-39CSV dimensions were substantially loaded (loading range: 0.53-0.89). As hypothesized, the PDQ-39CSV and PDQ-8CSV summary indices were highly correlated (Pearson's r:0.95, ICC:0.94); correlations between related PDQ and EQ-5D scores were generally strong (Spearman's p: 0.38-0.76, p < 0.001 for all). Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.64 to 0.90 and ICC values from 0.66 to 0.86. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting validity and reliability of both the PDQ-39CSV and its briefer version.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]