These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Thresholds for activation of rabbit retinal ganglion cells with relatively large, extracellular microelectrodes.
    Author: Jensen RJ, Ziv OR, Rizzo JF.
    Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Apr; 46(4):1486-96. PubMed ID: 15790920.
    Abstract:
    PURPOSE: To investigate the responses of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) to electrical stimulation, using electrodes comparable in size to those used in human studies investigating the feasibility of an electronic retinal prosthesis. METHODS: Rabbit retinas were stimulated in vitro with current pulses applied to the inner surface with 125- and 500-mum diameter electrodes while the responses of RGCs were recorded extracellularly. RESULTS: Both short-latency (SL; 3-5 ms) and long-latency (LL; >/=9 ms) responses were observed after electrical stimulation within the receptive field of an RGC. With short, 0.1-ms current pulses, the threshold current for the SL cell response was significantly lower than that for the LL cell response. With long (10- to 20-ms) pulses, the threshold currents for the SL and LL cell responses were very similar. The threshold current for the SL cell response increased more steeply than did the LL cell response when the electrode was displaced from the point of lowest electrical threshold, either above or along the surface of the retina. Stimulation of an RGC axon outside of the cell's receptive field produced only an SL response. For 0.1-ms duration pulses, the threshold current for the axonal response was significantly higher than the threshold current for the SL cell response. At pulse durations > 1 ms, the thresholds were very similar. CONCLUSIONS: RGC responses to electrical stimulation depend on the current pulse duration and location of the stimulating electrode. For an epiretinal prosthesis, short-duration current pulses may be preferable since they result in a more localized activation of the retina.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]