These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Is Q-wave on admission associated with microvascular injury in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated with primary angioplasty?].
    Author: Dobrzycki S, Korecki J, Kozuch M, Kamiński K, Latocha-Korecka G, Poniatowski B, Filipczuk P, Mazur M, Gorlo A, Musiał WJ.
    Journal: Przegl Lek; 2004; 61(9):891-4. PubMed ID: 15803893.
    Abstract:
    INTRODUCTION: Impaired microvascular flow, despite patent epicardial artery (no-reflow phenomenon), leads to greater left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction (MI). Predictive factors associated with no-reflow remain largely unexplored. Q-wave on admission (Q(A)) is a sign of extensive ischemia probably predisposing to no-reflow. The aim of the study was to explore possible relation between Q(A) and electrocardiographic signs of no-reflow in patients with first MI. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study group was composed of 108 patients (81 men; mean age 60+/-11 years), with first ST-segment elevation MI, treated successfully with primary angioplasty (p-PTCA). ECG tracings were obtained before and 30 minutes after p-PTCA. The sum of ST-segment elevations (sum(ST(el))) in 3 contiguous leads with the highest ST(el) was calculated. Lack of 50% reduction of the sum(ST(el)) 30 minutes after angioplasty was defined as ECG sign of no-reflow. Presence of Q(A) was estimated in leads with ST(el). RESULTS: Q(A) was found in 42 (39%) patients. Q(A) was more often observed in patients with ECG signs of no-reflow (38% vs. 18%; p<0.05). Group with Q(A) showed larger damage of left ventricle estimated with ECG QRS score (7.7+/-4.4 vs. 6.1+/-3.4; p<0.05) as well as worse ejection fraction (42% vs. 46%; p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Q(A) have more often ECG signs of no-reflow than other patients with MI. Previously described worse function of left ventricle in this group, may be partially caused by more frequent no-reflow occurring in those patients. This fact suggests that adjunctive therapy preventing no-reflow could be beneficial in this group of patients.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]