These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Complications encountered while using thin-wire-hybrid-external fixation modular frames for fracture fixation. A retrospective clinical analysis and possible support for "Damage Control Orthopaedic Surgery".
    Author: Lerner A, Chezar A, Haddad M, Kaufman H, Rozen N, Stein H.
    Journal: Injury; 2005 May; 36(5):590-8. PubMed ID: 15826616.
    Abstract:
    One hundred ninety eight adult patients who had sustained long bone fractures were treated by external fixation from admission to bone healing and consolidation. Of these, 135 had sustained high-energy injuries, 39 of them had suffered multi-system injuries. Superficial pin track infection was the most common complication, occurring predominantly in pins located in the femur, upper tibia and upper humerus. There were no cases of deep infection or osteomyelitis. One patient with a femoral shaft fracture developed a DVT although he was on preventive low molecular weight heparin, i.e. sc Clexane 40 mg daily. There were no cases of PE or ARDS. External fixation systems are a minimal invasive surgical modality, which allow three-dimensional fracture fixation after closed or minimal open reduction. They require a good command of surgical anatomy, but provide an optimal preservation of the fracture's soft tissue envelope, the critical biological factor for new bone formation and fracture healing. Recent publications have suggested that in the critically ill patient, minimally invasive fracture fixation surgery may prevent the perpetuation of a reactive, life threatening inflammatory reaction (the "second hit") which may induce the development of multiple organ dysfunction (MODS).
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]