These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Differential effects of angiotensin II on atherogenesis at the aortic sinus and descending aorta of apolipoprotein-E-deficient mice.
    Author: Zhou Y, Chen R, Catanzaro SE, Hu L, Dansky HM, Catanzaro DF.
    Journal: Am J Hypertens; 2005 Apr; 18(4 Pt 1):486-92. PubMed ID: 15831357.
    Abstract:
    Angiotensin (Ang) II infusion increases atherosclerosis and leads to the formation of abdominal aortic aneurysms in apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE-/-) mice. Conversely, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) decreases atherosclerosis in this model. However, there are conflicting data in the literature concerning responses to both Ang II infusion and RAS blockade which may depend on age, sex, dose, duration of treatment, and the site at which lesion area was measured. In the present study we examined the effects of Ang II infusion on lesion formation in male ApoE-/- mice both at the aortic sinus and in the descending aorta, starting at different ages, and varying in duration. We also tested the effects of the Ang II receptor antagonist losartan at different doses in both males and females. Blood pressure and plasma renin concentration (PRC) were measured as indicators of the hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects of these treatments. Administration of Ang II increased lesion area much more in the descending aorta than at the aortic sinus. However, spontaneous lesion development at the aortic sinus was much greater than in more distal regions of the aorta. Aneurysms were observed in all treatment groups but were less severe in animals treated from 4 weeks age, possibly because of protective remodeling. Losartan treatment reduced lesion area at the aortic sinus, although differences were only significant in female mice. These findings demonstrate regional and temporal differences in the sensitivity of the aorta to the effects of RAS stimulation and blockade, and may help to explain some of the discrepancies between previous reports from other laboratories.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]