These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed


  • Title: Characteristics of population with normal serum creatinine impaired renal function and: the validation of a MDRD formula in a healthy general population.
    Author: Kang YS, Han KH, Han SY, Kim HK, Cha DR.
    Journal: Clin Nephrol; 2005 Apr; 63(4):258-66. PubMed ID: 15847252.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) provides the most accurate estimation of renal function. This study investigated the clinical characteristics of patients with impaired renal function having a normal serum creatinine level. We also validated whether the new Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula can be applied in a healthy general population. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total 393 participants who had serum creatinine concentration below 132.6 micromol/L without underlying diseases were randomly selected on an address basis in Ansan City. According to the level of GFR, they were divided into 3 groups and we analyzed their clinical characteristics. In 75 subjects, who were randomly selected 25 cases in each group based on GFR estimated by Cockcroft-Gault (C-G) formula, true GFR was measured using the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method. RESULTS: A total 393 (male: 106, female: 287) participants were as follows: GFR < 60 ml/min/1.73 m2; 4% (n = 25); 60 < or = GFR < 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 26.2% (n = 103); GFR > or = 90 ml/min/1.73 m2; 67.4% (n = 265). In the group of decreased GFR, the mean age was older (67.4+/-10.7 vs. 48.7+/-12.8 vs. 39.4+/-8.2 years, p < 0.001), the gender was male (90.33+/-28.77 vs. 110.55+/-31.64, p < 0.001), and amount of proteinuria more increased (0.61 (0.56) vs. 0.33 (0.34) vs. 0.38 (0.33) gm/day, p = 0.007). The accuracy and precision of each formula were assessed by the difference in GFR measured by the 99mTc-DTPA renal clearance method--estimated GFR by each formula (deltaGFR), and the coefficient of determination (r2) of different predictive equations. The results were as follows: deltaGFR = -14.78+/-46.03, r2 = 0.79 (24-hour urinary creatinine clearance), deltaGFR=-16.79+/-57.32, r2 = 0.66 (100/serum creatinine), deltaGFR = 9.54+/-39.18, r2 = 0.87 (C-G formula), deltaGFR = -12.30+/-54.31, r2 = 0.66 (AASK formula), deltaGFR = 8.70+/-37.62, r2 = 0.79 (MDRD formula). Multiple linear regression analysis and logistic regression analysis showed that age, serum creatinine, total cholesterol and 24-hour urinary protein excretion were independently related to GFR and associated with a significant increase in the risk of decrement of GFR. CONCLUSIONS: From these results, a more accurate assessment of renal function should be required in a population characterized by older age, male gender and more proteinuria. The MDRD study formula and Cockcroft-Gault formula have greater accuracy and precision with true GFR, and this equation can be applied in subjects with healthy general population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]