These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: In vitro and in vivo evaluation of cotton wool filtration of platelet concentrates obtained by automated and manual apheresis.
    Author: Holme S, Snyder E, Heaton A, Keegan T, Napychank P.
    Journal: Transfusion; 1992 May; 32(4):328-33. PubMed ID: 1585437.
    Abstract:
    The effect of cotton wool filtration of apheresis platelet concentrates (PCs) on platelet viability and complement activation was evaluated by two laboratories. PCs were prepared by automated (Lab A, n = 5) or manual (Lab B, n = 5) apheresis. After storage for 1 day, the PC was filtered through cotton wool before transfusion on one occasion and, on the other occasion, filtered through a standard screen filter before transfusion to the same donor. Five paired studies were performed by each laboratory. Except for a small, but significant reduction in mean platelet size, from 7.3 +/- 1.1 to 6.6 +/- 0.9 microns 3, after cotton wool filtration, no effect of filtration on various tests of in vitro platelet function and morphologic integrity was found. As demonstrated by autologous radiolabeled studies, no effect of cotton wool filtration on platelet viability was found by Laboratory B, while Laboratory A found a slight increase in the percentage of recovery from 59 +/- 4 to 68 +/- 13 percent, and a small reduction in survival, from 8.2 +/- 0.9 to 7.7 +/- 0.5 days after cotton wool filtration (p less than 0.05). Cotton wool filtration was associated with a slight increase in C3a levels found in manual apheresis PCs. Neither laboratory found any effect of cotton wool filtration per se on the recipients' white cell (WBC) counts or C3a and C5a levels after transfusion.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]