These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Corticotropin-releasing hormone effects on human pregnant vs. nonpregnant myometrium explants estimated from a mathematical model of uterine contraction. Author: Mignot TM, Paris B, Carbonne B, Vauge C, Ferré F, Vaiman D. Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985); 2005 Sep; 99(3):1157-63. PubMed ID: 15860688. Abstract: In this paper, we applied a new theoretical model of uterine contraction to a large panel of human pregnant and nonpregnant myometrial strips, treated or not by corticotrophin-releasing hormone (CRH). This model is based on a fine analysis of the contraction curves. This analysis yielded four mathematical parameters (beta, theta, tau 1, and tau 2) related to excitability, duration of plateau phase, and time constants for relaxation describing, respectively, the different portions of the contraction cycle. This leads to specific differences in spontaneous contractile activity between pregnant and nonpregnant states. The relaxing effect of CRH in the pregnant state is presumably correlated with the origin of the strips (the lower uterine segment). Besides our observation of a specific receptor-dependent relaxing effect of CRH in both pregnant and nonpregnant myometrium, we could identify highly significant effects at given CRH concentration for beta in nonpregnant myometrium and for theta, tau 1, and tau 2 in pregnant myometrium. In addition, highly significant differences were found between pregnant and nonpregnant myometrium. Also, we discovered a strong correlation between theta and tau 1, specifically in the pregnant state. Although the biochemical signification of these results remains to be elucidated, they contribute to emphasize the complex network of CRH action at the myometrial level. Furthermore, our approach could pave the way toward a better analysis of the efficacy of the uterine contractile behavior.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]