These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Search MEDLINE/PubMed
Title: Pitfalls of immunoassay and sample for IGF-I: comparison of different assay methodologies using various fresh and stored serum samples. Author: Khosravi J, Diamandi A, Bodani U, Khaja N, Krishna RG. Journal: Clin Biochem; 2005 Jul; 38(7):659-66. PubMed ID: 15885685. Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Determination of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I is now a routine adjunct to multiple research and clinical investigations. Evidence has associated higher IGF-I levels with various human pathologies, but the reported associations have not been invariably confirmed. We examined the potential for post-sampling proteolysis and evaluated the impact of such events on IGF-I immunoassays. DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared IGF-I in different sets of fresh and frozen old samples using four different and commonly used immunoassays. The potential for post-sampling proteolysis was further examined by assaying fresh samples stored for 4 weeks at various temperatures in the absence or presence of protease inhibitors. RESULTS: IGF-I levels in fresh serum samples from adult males, females, and pregnant subjects by all methods were similar and were highly correlated (r=0.85-0.97). The same was true for levels in frozen ( approximately 2 years at --80 degrees C) samples from diabetic patients, which are reportedly associated with enhanced proteolytic activity. In contrast, in another set of frozen adult male and female samples ( approximately 8 years at --20 degrees C), the inter-method median IGF-I levels varied by approximately 3- to 4-fold and the values poorly correlated. Similar variability in the inter-method response was also observed when IGF-I in the replicates of fresh samples stored at 4 degrees C for 4 weeks was measured. However, the 4 degrees C storage effect could be completely blocked by the addition of protease inhibitors, allowing for all assays to detect 92--101% of the expected mean levels. CONCLUSIONS: The data indicate susceptibility of IGF-I to significant post-sampling proteolysis and suggest the importance of immunoassays for the intact molecule. Immunoassays that lack specificity for intact IGF-I may mask the potential pathophysiological effects of proteolysis and generate misleading results, particularly in studies involving inappropriately stored and/or proteolyzed samples. In such cases, underestimation of the in vivo levels by the intact assays would occur, but the findings of low IGF-I levels may be indicative of questionable sample quality.[Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]