These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Effective comparison of two auto-CPAP devices for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea based on polysomnographic evaluation.
    Author: Shi HB, Cheng L, Nakayama M, Kakazu Y, Yin M, Miyoshi A, Komune S.
    Journal: Auris Nasus Larynx; 2005 Sep; 32(3):237-41. PubMed ID: 15893440.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Automatic continuous positive airway pressure (auto-CPAP) machines differ mainly in algorithms used for respiratory event detection and pressure control. The auto-CPAP machines operated by novel algorithms are expected to have better performance than the earlier ones in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS). OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the therapeutic characteristics between two different auto-CPAP devices, i.e., the third-generation flow-based (f-APAP) and the second-generation vibration-based (v-APAP) machines, during the first night treatment of OSAS. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the polysomnography (PSG) recordings of 43 OSAS patients who were initially performed an overnight diagnostic PSG to confirm the disease and afterwards received the first night auto-CPAP treatment with using either the f-APAP (n=22) or v-APAP (n=21) device under another PSG evaluation. RESULTS: There were 13.6% and 61.9% patients who remained a residual apnea/hypopnea index more than 5 during the f-APAP and v-APAP application, respectively (P<0.005). The f-APAP was more effective than the v-APAP in reducing apnea/hypopnea index (P=0.003), hypopnea index (P=0.023) and apnea index (P=0.007), improving the lowest oxygen saturation index (P=0.007) and shortening stage 1 sleep (P=0.016). However, the f-APAP was less sufficient than the v-APAP in reducing arousal/awakening index (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that the f-APAP works better than the v-APAP in abolishing breathing abnormities in the treatment of OSAS; however, the f-APAP device might still have some potential limitations in the clinical application.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]