These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: [Does an injection filter modify the cranial spread of a sensory blockade in epidural anesthesia?].
    Author: Schulte U, Nolte H, Prippenow G.
    Journal: Anaesthesist; 1992 Apr; 41(4):228-30. PubMed ID: 1590581.
    Abstract:
    UNLABELLED: In a prospective study we compared the spread of sensory blockade in epidural anaesthesia with and without Micropore filter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 32 patients undergoing varicose vein stripping under epidural anaesthesia were randomly assigned to two groups of 16 each. Bupivacaine 0.75% and POR 8 (0.1 IU/ml) were administered by means of a constant-velocity perfusor. In group A a Micropore filter was inserted between the perfusor syringe and the epidural catheter. In group B the epidural catheter was connected to the syringe without the filter. The puncture was performed at the L3-4 interspace with the patient in a sitting position. An epidural catheter was advanced 3 cm cephalad. Using the pin-prick method, the sensory level of the blockade was tested 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 and 30 min after injection of the local anesthetic solution. Statistical evaluation was performed with the t-test for unpaired samples. RESULTS. After 10 min the spread of analgesia was 5.75 +/- 1.26 segments in group A and 8 +/- 1.89 segments in group B; after 15 min it was 7.06 +/- 1.62 segments and 9.56 +/- 1.54 segments; after 20 min, 7.87 +/- 1.62 segments and 10.62 +/- 1.45 segments; and after 30 min 8.12 +/- 1.66 segments and 11.12 +/- 1.45 segments in group A and B, respectively. At any time sensory blockade was higher in group B (without Micropore filters) than in group A. The mean difference between the two groups amounted to 2-3 segments. The differences were significant at any time (P less than 0.001). These results show that the use of a Micropore filter in epidural anaesthesia leads to a reduced spread of sensory blockade. In our own examinations we found lowering of the pressure of the local anaesthetic solution that passes through the Micropore filter compared with the pressure of the solution injected without the filter. This seems to be the reason for the reduced spread of sensory blockade. Using these filters the onset of analgesia is delayed, and a given spread of analgesia needs a larger dose of local anaesthetic and is thus accompanied by a higher toxicity.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]