These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Predicting difficult intubation--a comparison between Mallampati classification and Wilson risk-sum.
    Author: Siddiqi R, Kazi WA.
    Journal: J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):253-6. PubMed ID: 15907231.
    Abstract:
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the Mallampati classification and Wilson risk-sum and adopt a predictive rule in our setup that has better results. DESIGN: An analytical study. PLACE AND DURATION OF STUDY: The main Operation Theatre of Combined Military Hospital, Rawalpindi from 1st September to 31st December 2000. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and thirty-eight patients were evaluated pre-operatively for difficult intubation using both the tests. The sensitivities, specificities and positive predictive values (PPV) were determined in grading the laryngeal view in each case during direct laryngoscopy. RESULTS: Both tests identified only 3 out of 7 difficult intubations, giving a similar sensitivity of 0.42. Twice as many patients were predicted to be difficult by Mallampati classification than by Wilson risk-sum (specificity 84% and 93%). The Wilson risk-sum had better positive predictive value (11%) as compared to 5% of Mallampati classification. CONCLUSION: The Wilson risk-sum had preferred for assessment of the airway because of its better specificity and positive predictive value while noting that both tests have poor sensitivities when used alone.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]