These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Results of an international round robin for the quantification of serum non-transferrin-bound iron: Need for defining standardization and a clinically relevant isoform.
    Author: Jacobs EM, Hendriks JC, van Tits BL, Evans PJ, Breuer W, Liu DY, Jansen EH, Jauhiainen K, Sturm B, Porter JB, Scheiber-Mojdehkar B, von Bonsdorff L, Cabantchik ZI, Hider RC, Swinkels DW.
    Journal: Anal Biochem; 2005 Jun 15; 341(2):241-50. PubMed ID: 15907869.
    Abstract:
    Non-transferrin-bound iron (NTBI) appears in the circulation of patients with iron overload. Various methods to measure NTBI were comparatively assessed as part of an international interlaboratory study. Six laboratories participated in the study, using methods based on iron mobilization and detection with iron chelators or on reactivity with bleomycin. Serum samples of 12 patients with hereditary (n=11) and secondary (n=1) hemochromatosis were measured during a 3-day analysis using 4 determinations per sample per day, making a total of 144 measurements per laboratory. Bland-Altman plots for repeated measurements are presented. The methods differed widely in mean serum NTBI level (range 0.12-4.32mumol/L), between-sample variation (SD range 0.20-2.13mumol/L and CV range 49.3-391.3%), and within-sample variation (SD range 0.02-0.45mumol/L and CV range 4.4-193.2%). The results obtained with methods based on chelators correlated significantly (R(2) range 0.86-0.99). On the other hand, NTBI values obtained by the various methods related differently from those of serum transferrin saturation (TS) when expressed in terms of both regression coefficients and NTBI levels at TS of 50%. Recent studies underscore the clinical relevance of NTBI in the management of iron-overloaded patients. However, before measurement of NTBI can be introduced into clinical practice, there is a need for more reproducible protocols as well as information on which method best represents the pathophysiological phenomenon and is most pertinent for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]