These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Search MEDLINE/PubMed

  • Title: Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population.
    Author: Anandaraja S, Narang R, Godeswar R, Laksmy R, Talwar KK.
    Journal: Int J Cardiol; 2005 Jun 22; 102(1):117-20. PubMed ID: 15939107.
    Abstract:
    BACKGROUND: Estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is crucial in the management of ischemic heart disease patients. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol is routinely calculated in laboratories world over by applying Friedewald formula for logistic reasons. We derived a new formula based on multiple regression approach. METHODS: Lipid profiles were done on blood samples of 2008 patients. In initial 1000 patients, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was estimated by a direct method and also by Friedewald formula. By applying linear regression methods on the data of direct estimation method, a new formula was obtained and the accuracy of this new formula was validated in the next 1008 patients. RESULTS: The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 116+/-41.5 mg/dl (3.02+/-1.08 mmol/l) measured by direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay and that calculated by Friedewald formula was 119+/-46 mg/dl (3.09+/-1.2 mmol/l) for the initial 1000 patients. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured by direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay and calculated from Friedewald formula showed good correlation (r = 0.88), however, there was minimal overestimation by the Friedewald formula. The correlation improved between direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and calculated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol after excluding the patients with triglycerides more than 350 mg/dl (r = 0.92). The mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol measured by the direct assay and by new formula in the next 1008 patients was 117+/-40 mg/dl (3.04+/-1.04 mmol/l) and 113.7+/-37 mg/dl (2.96+/-0.96 mmol/l), respectively with very good correlation (r = 0.97) between them. CONCLUSIONS: The new formula derived from multiple linear regression analysis appears to be more accurate than Friedewald formula in Indian population.
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [New Search]